Which layout do you think I should do?

[Delock]

Trying to decide which layout would look good in my tank.

1.


2.



3.


4.


5.

[gotticgs]

2

[eklikewhoa]

1.
2
3
5
4

In that order.

but you do realize some of those will not be ideal in your tank.

[eklikewhoa]

You know what... #5 has a nice look to it being in a cubish tank. Good use of space and really does wonders for depth perception.

[Delock]

why ole great one

[J-WS6]

4,5 then 1

2 and 3 have a bit too much going on in there scape wise.

[eklikewhoa]

Your tank is 7ft long and like 10ft tall.

With the scapes above it requires massive stones that will pull off the scape on their own which you see above so on the scale to fit your tank these stones would be ungodly large.


You know the more I look at it the more #5 stands out to me.
#1 has the lighting effect which kind of tricks you into liking the scape but I guess it would have to be #2 or #5 for me.

I know what it took to boost the rocks I have in my tank into the tank so times that by like 10..... uhm yeah.

[eklikewhoa]

4,5 then 1

2 and 3 have a bit too much going on in there scape wise.

Hmmm... I was gonna say something about #4 but I am gonna not now.

[J-WS6]

haha, go for it. I won't be offended.

[J-WS6]

Seeing as he's doing furcifers, having the largest possible sand bed available would only benefit them.

[eklikewhoa]

It looks like garbage.... probably would have pulled off a stronger display with just sand pits and a nice group of fish.

[J-WS6]

but what I can I say, I'm a minimalist at heart.

[J-WS6]

Well, there are a few things I don't like about it, but the asymmetrical aspect is what caught my eye. But the rocks all should def. match.

[Delock]

minimalist....me too lol

[eklikewhoa]

Seeing as he's doing furcifers, having the largest possible sand bed available would only benefit them.

Yeah but it also has to be bearable to look at.