Re: We hold these truths
If you really wanted it to be fair, Basically all those above poverty line (whatever that line is because they say it needs to be re-evaluated) should pay a flat rate and then there would be no need for all these crazy tax laws. if everyone pays the same it would be hard pressed to say that wasnt fair. now those that would argue that would say that those that want to invest should get breaks because they help the economy. SO those that end up making more pay less, and therefor not fair. I have my 2 small small businesses (not even enough to make much of a difference) but i could theoritically write off a whole bunch of stuff as they are materials for my businesses. but i simply look at that cost as an investment. i factor that into my cost and whether i can afford to get more before i pick up new clients. I plan for the worst and sometimes get the best. (good example i got a lot of Salt supplies for a client because they said they wanted more frequent maintnance, and they backed out of the deal because i didnt get a contract because i dont have a tax license, i know i should get one, and now i basically broke even and havent made a dime off the whole deal.) that happens a lot in business. Actually if things dont go the way they planned Businesses lose money. thats the RISK. Thats what i hated about those Stimulus packages, Businesses that made bad descisions by making bad loans to people complain when the economy downturns and they are out millions for making loans to people and raising the rates beyond what they can pay. Seems they got greedy and made a bad choice )as did the people who got Variable rate loans, not the best choice. But Bailing them out is just as bad as Bailing out someone on Welfare. And would cost a whole lot more then Welfare does. funny How its ok to Bail out the Wealthy and not the Downtrodden. Now i HATE how welfare works now. But dont act like a Stimulus package isnt the same thing for companies.
If you really wanted it to be fair, Basically all those above poverty line (whatever that line is because they say it needs to be re-evaluated) should pay a flat rate and then there would be no need for all these crazy tax laws. if everyone pays the same it would be hard pressed to say that wasnt fair. now those that would argue that would say that those that want to invest should get breaks because they help the economy. SO those that end up making more pay less, and therefor not fair. I have my 2 small small businesses (not even enough to make much of a difference) but i could theoritically write off a whole bunch of stuff as they are materials for my businesses. but i simply look at that cost as an investment. i factor that into my cost and whether i can afford to get more before i pick up new clients. I plan for the worst and sometimes get the best. (good example i got a lot of Salt supplies for a client because they said they wanted more frequent maintnance, and they backed out of the deal because i didnt get a contract because i dont have a tax license, i know i should get one, and now i basically broke even and havent made a dime off the whole deal.) that happens a lot in business. Actually if things dont go the way they planned Businesses lose money. thats the RISK. Thats what i hated about those Stimulus packages, Businesses that made bad descisions by making bad loans to people complain when the economy downturns and they are out millions for making loans to people and raising the rates beyond what they can pay. Seems they got greedy and made a bad choice )as did the people who got Variable rate loans, not the best choice. But Bailing them out is just as bad as Bailing out someone on Welfare. And would cost a whole lot more then Welfare does. funny How its ok to Bail out the Wealthy and not the Downtrodden. Now i HATE how welfare works now. But dont act like a Stimulus package isnt the same thing for companies.
Comment